Addressing Water Quality Issues: Field Testing Water

By Scott Manley, La Marzocco

Mercuric Thiocyanate is my new favorite word. I’m adding it to my personal water vocabulary of seemingly difficult to pronounce terms along with Hexavalent Chromium and Trihalomethanes.  Hexavalent Chromium and Trihalomethanes, in case you are unfamiliar with these, are not something we are concerned with when testing water for coffee, as they are not associated with either equipment failure or extraction issues.  They are, however, commonly tested for analytes in water. I occasionally reference them when speaking to other water quality professionals about water testing and the specific needs of specialty coffee. For me they serve as a frame of reference for the particulars of water that we are most concerned with. They are at the other end of the spectrum of contaminants, the dangerous ones, that most EPA accredited labs test for.  And most presorted tests will include these within a standard range of tests. Thankfully, the vast majority of our drinking water is biologically safe to drink and brew with. So we get to focus on testing for the components that do affect equipment and brewing. 

 

According to Wikipedia (n.d):

Mercury(II) thiocyanate (Hg(SCN)2) is an inorganic chemical compound, the coordination complex of Hg2+ and the thiocyanate anion. It is a white powder. 

 

I received a bottle of the stuff via Amazon Prime last week.  

 

Mercuric Thiocyanate has two major commercial uses; first, it can improve detection limits in the determination of chloride ions in water by UV-visible spectroscopy ( I am currently setting up the processes to use spectrophotometer for water analysis).  And second, it was used in pyrotechnics, when the compound is in the presence of a strong enough heat source, a rapid exothermic reaction is started which produces a large mass of coiling serpent-like solid, so called Pharaoh’s serpent or Pharaoh’s snake.  I remember these from my childhood. Oh, and also its toxic.

 

Testing for the analyte chloride, using it’s associated toxic reagent, Mercuric Thiocyanate, makes using a spectrophotometer less than practical in the field.  They are also require frequent calibration, are expensive, and don’t fit into a tool bag easily. So when one is on a field service call for equipment repair there are other more efficient and economical ways to get a snapshot of the water quality while onsite.  I have previously written about the TDS meter, the most common tool used, and it’s relative usefulness and limitations. I believe every tech should have one and know how to use it. It is practical, inexpensive and provides a quick hit on one measurement of water quality. In my last position as master technician and technical trainer at Ecowater Systems, techs were required to record TDS and general hardness measurements on every espresso service work order to ensure,  at a minimum, that we were not ignoring potential water issues that our customer should be informed of.  

 

Another set of tools I believe is import to have on hand are test trips, also called dip strips.  While not as accurate as a lab test, they are far more accessible and easy to carry in a tool bag.  You also get the results right away, which is important when reporting to a customer about a water related issue or equipment repair while onsite.  When properly used, they also can provide the tech with confidence needed in communicating with operators and managers who ultimately are charged with making decisions about the timing and expense of treating water in the cafes we service.  Test strips consist of a ribbon made of plastic or paper of about 5 millimetre wide, plastic strips have pads impregnated with chemicals that react with the compounds present in water. For the paper strips the reactants are absorbed directly onto the paper. Paper strips are often specific to a single reaction (e.g. pH measurement), while the strips with pads allow several determinations simultaneously.  The resultant chemical reaction of the reagent in the water sample is indicated by a change in color on the test strip. Test strips are packaged either as a set with a range of tests or individually in foil packets for specific analytes. They are one time use tools that do not require batteries, special handling or calibration. The instructions for using them are not uniform, but are specific to each test with regards to the parameter being tested, so it is important to read the instructions carefully before using them.  Most of the reported errors or discrepancies with test strips are do to users not familiarizing themselves with these procedures before hand. So if you are unfamiliar with, or using a test for the first time, slow down and be deliberate. The more you use them the easier it gets, and the more confidence you have in the results. There are test strips for nearly all of the parameters of water quality that we in the specialty coffee industry are concerned with. Most test strips cost less than a dollar each, which makes them relatively inexpensive to incorporate into your service call.  To put this into perspective, I have been surveying costs of EPA and state accredited labs for water analysis, with the cost being between $85 on the low end and $160 on the high. There is also some variability with regards to shipping costs for samples which adds even more cost. The average turnaround time for getting results seems to fall right around 2 weeks; or about the time it takes for an operator to completely forget that a water issue is the underlying cause of their recent service call (and potential future service calls). 

 

The primary test trips most techs we would be using are those that test for same parameters identified by the SCA and equipment manufactures for proper brewing and equipment longevity.  Those being: 

 

 

 I gave a presentation earlier this year during SCA Expo demonstrating field testing using dip strips and was made aware of one significant drawback to using colorimetric testing, which includes drip strips and manual titration; and that was when one of the attendees announced he was colorblind.  I was previously unaware that 8% of men are colorblind in various degrees, with red-green being the most common. If you are colorblind there are ways to work around this, one is to acquire a handheld photometer which will translate the reagent color to a numerical value, another possible solution is to see a vision specialist about color correcting glasses.

 

I would encourage everyone to investigate adding dip strips to your parts stock and service regimen. Having the right tools to identify water problems and documenting your work will help you to have confidence in communicating with customers and industry partners.  Assessing water quality before it becomes a problem is another way to look out for your customers. 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *